Possible Effects Of Scrapping Post-UTME And Pegging Cut-Off Mark At 180 - MySayBook

Latest

Ads by Google

Advertisement
Commercial Break..........↓↓↓↓↓↓

Official Page -
http://fb.com/RNEAC

15 April, 2018

Possible Effects Of Scrapping Post-UTME And Pegging Cut-Off Mark At 180



Following a portion of the choices taken at the 2016 JAMB Combined Policy meeting which incorporate the official declaration of the 2016 cut-off check as 180 for Universities, Polytechnic and Colleges of instruction and the rejecting of Post-UTME, numerous competitors are soliciting a ton from inquiries concerning how the affirmation procedure during the current year will run.

Having analyzed the circumstance, we might want to bring up a few factors that may likely come in to play in 2016 affirmation process.

Initial, one thing that will probably be a drop out of this new advancement is the way that the cut off-characteristic of best establishments like UNIBEN, UNILORIN, OAU, UI, UNILAG may shoot up to 220, 240 or even 250. Nonetheless, no foundation will go underneath 180.

The duty of setting hopefuls in schools will now dwell with JAMB. Be that as it may, JAMB needs to first affirm the necessities of foundations before setting hopefuls in such organization. For example, if UNIBEN chooses that its cut-off check during the current year is 250, it is just competitors who connected to contemplate in UNIBEN and score up to 250 will secure confirmation.

So also, since the seat cut-off check is 180, JAMB may choose to re-appropriate hopefuls who scored up to 180 to different establishments (who knows, it could be a college, polytechnic or College of training since they all have a similar cut-off stamp) if the foundation they initially picked have achieved its confirmation amount or if such applicants UTME score fall underneath the set cut-off sign of their particular organizations.

The rejecting of Post-UTME does not really imply that establishments can’t direct different types of screening, it just means they can’t lead another type of examination like UTME. So schools may choose to utilize oral meeting or confirmation of reports to screen hopefuls.

The rejecting of post-UTME will similarly spare applicants the cost of buying their school’s post-UTME frame and experiencing the typical problems related with it.

Notwithstanding, every one of these components will be required to play out when ASUU, ASUP and NCEE acknowledge the result of the 2016 JAMB Combined Policy meeting.

Since these bodies are yet to express their position on this, we will just hold up to perceive how it plays out toward its finish all.

Presently, lets know your assessment on this or what you think the confirmation procedure will resemble.